|
|
46.
|
|
|
This boundary-way has admin_level $1 but belongs to a relation with lower admin_level (higher priority); it should have the lowest admin_level of all relations
|
|
|
|
|
Denne 'boundary-way' har admin_level $1, men tilhører en relation med lavere admin_level (højere prioritet); den burde have det laveste admin_level af alle relationer
|
|
Translated and reviewed by
mjjzf
|
|
|
|
|
47.
|
|
|
This turn-restriction has no restriction type
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
48.
|
|
|
This turn-restriction has no known restriction type
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
49.
|
|
|
A turn-restriction needs exactly one $1 member. This one has $2
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
50.
|
|
|
From- and To-members of turn restrictions need to be ways. $1
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
51.
|
|
|
from- via- and to- members of a turn resctriction need to be connected
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
52.
|
|
|
via (node #$1) is not the first or the last member of from (way #$2)
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
53.
|
|
|
via (node #$1) is not the first or the last member of to (way #$2)
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
54.
|
|
|
restriction type is $1, but angle is $2 degrees. Maybe the restriction type is not appropriate?
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
55.
|
|
|
wrong direction of to way $1
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
