|
|
43.
|
|
|
The boundary of $1 has no valid numeric admin_level. Please do not use admin levels like for example 6;7. Always tag the lowest admin_level of all boundaries.
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
44.
|
|
|
The boundary of $1 is not closed-loop
|
|
|
|
|
Denne $1-afgrænsning er ikke en lukket løkke
|
|
Translated and reviewed by
mjjzf
|
|
|
|
|
45.
|
|
|
The boundary of $1 splits here
|
|
|
|
|
Afgrænsningen af $1 brydes her
|
|
Translated and reviewed by
mjjzf
|
|
|
|
|
46.
|
|
|
This boundary-way has admin_level $1 but belongs to a relation with lower admin_level (higher priority); it should have the lowest admin_level of all relations
|
|
|
|
|
Denne 'boundary-way' har admin_level $1, men tilhører en relation med lavere admin_level (højere prioritet); den burde have det laveste admin_level af alle relationer
|
|
Translated and reviewed by
mjjzf
|
|
|
|
|
47.
|
|
|
This turn-restriction has no restriction type
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
48.
|
|
|
This turn-restriction has no known restriction type
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
49.
|
|
|
A turn-restriction needs exactly one $1 member. This one has $2
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
50.
|
|
|
From- and To-members of turn restrictions need to be ways. $1
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
51.
|
|
|
from- via- and to- members of a turn resctriction need to be connected
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
|
|
52.
|
|
|
via (node #$1) is not the first or the last member of from (way #$2)
|
|
|
|
|
(no translation yet)
|
|
|
