Translations by Jen Ockwell
Jen Ockwell has submitted the following strings to this translation. Contributions are visually coded: currently used translations, unreviewed suggestions, rejected suggestions.
12. |
Exits
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Exits
|
|
13. |
Bases
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Bases
|
|
14. |
Entries
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Entries
|
|
15. |
Marks
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Marks
|
|
16. |
Add Exit Anchor...
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Add Exit Anchor...
|
|
17. |
Add Base Anchor...
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Add Base Anchor...
|
|
18. |
Add Entry Anchor...
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Add Entry Anchor...
|
|
19. |
Add Mark Anchor...
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Add Mark Anchor...
|
|
20. |
Anchor Control for class %.100s in glyph %.100s as %.20s
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Anchor Control for class %.100s in glyph %.100s as %.20s
|
|
21. |
mark
|
|
2007-12-30 |
mark
|
|
22. |
cursive entry
|
|
2008-01-01 |
cursive entry
|
|
23. |
cursive exit
|
|
2008-01-01 |
cursive exit
|
|
24. |
base
|
|
2008-01-01 |
base
|
|
25. |
Anchor Control
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Anchor Control
|
|
26. |
Detaching Anchor Point
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Detaching Anchor Point
|
|
27. |
This anchor was attached to point %d, but that's not a point I can move. I'm detaching the anchor from the point.
|
|
2008-01-01 |
This anchor was attached to point %d, but that's not a point I can move. I'm detaching the anchor from the point.
|
|
30. |
Provide a glyph name
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Provide a glyph name
|
|
31. |
Please identify a glyph by name, and FontForge will add an anchor to that glyph.
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Please identify a glyph by name, and FontForge will add an anchor to that glyph.
|
|
32. |
Non-existant glyph
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Non-existant glyph
|
|
33. |
The glyph, %.80s, is not in the font
|
|
2008-01-01 |
The glyph, %.80s, is not in the font
|
|
34. |
Duplicate Anchor Class
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Duplicate Anchor Class
|
|
35. |
The glyph, %.80s, already contains an anchor in this class, %.80s.
|
|
2007-12-30 |
The glyph, %.80s, already contains an anchor in this class, %.80s.
|
|
37. |
The size at which the current glyph is rasterized.
For small pixelsize you may want to use the magnification
factor below to get a clearer view.
|
|
2007-12-30 |
The size at which the current glyph is rasterised.
For small pixel size you may want to use the magnification
factor below to get a clearer view.
|
|
38. |
The size at which the current glyph is rasterized.
For small pixelsize you may want to use the magnification
factor below to get a clearer view.
The pulldown list contains the pixelsizes at which there
are device table corrections.
|
|
2007-12-30 |
The size at which the current glyph is rasterised.
For small pixel size you may want to use the magnification
factor below to get a clearer view.
The pulldown list contains the pixel sizes at which there
are device table corrections.
|
|
40. |
The glyph is rasterized at the size above, but it
may be difficult to see the alignment errors
that can happen at small pixelsizes. This allows
you to expand each pixel to show potential problems
better.
|
|
2007-12-30 |
The glyph is rasterised at the size above, but it
may be difficult to see the alignment errors
that can happen at small pixel sizes. This allows
you to expand each pixel to show potential problems
better.
|
|
41. |
The X coordinate of the anchor point in this glyph
|
|
2007-12-30 |
The X coordinate of the anchor point in this glyph
|
|
44. |
This is the number of pixels by which the anchor
should be moved horizontally when the glyph is
rasterized at the above size. This information
is part of the device table for this anchor.
Device tables are particularly important at small
pixelsizes where rounding errors will have a
proportionally greater effect.
|
|
2007-12-30 |
This is the number of pixels by which the anchor
should be moved horizontally when the glyph is
rasterised at the above size. This information
is part of the device table for this anchor.
Device tables are particularly important at small
pixel sizes where rounding errors will have a
proportionally greater effect.
|
|
45. |
The Y coordinate of the anchor point in this glyph
|
|
2007-12-30 |
The Y coordinate of the anchor point in this glyph
|
|
46. |
This is the number of pixels by which the anchor
should be moved vertically when the glyph is
rasterized at the above size. This information
is part of the device table for this anchor.
Device tables are particularly important at small
pixelsizes where rounding errors will have a
proportionally greater effect.
|
|
2007-12-30 |
This is the number of pixels by which the anchor
should be moved vertically when the glyph is
rasterised at the above size. This information
is part of the device table for this anchor.
Device tables are particularly important at small
pixel sizes where rounding errors will have a
proportionally greater effect.
|
|
78. |
Select a subtable
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Select a subtable
|
|
79. |
You must select a lookup subtable in which to store the kerning pairs
|
|
2008-01-01 |
You must select a lookup subtable in which to store the kerning pairs
|
|
84. |
Enter two glyph ranges to be adjusted.
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Enter two glyph ranges to be adjusted.
|
|
88. |
Lookup subtable:
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Lookup subtable:
|
|
248. |
New Positioning
|
|
2008-01-01 |
New Positioning
|
|
256. |
Select hints between which counters are formed
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Select hints between which counters are formed
|
|
265. |
Duplicate Ligature
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Duplicate Ligature
|
|
266. |
There are two ligature entries with the same components (%.80s) in the same lookup subtable (%.30s)
|
|
2008-01-01 |
There are two ligature entries with the same components (%.80s) in the same lookup subtable (%.30s)
|
|
267. |
Duplicate Kern data
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Duplicate Kern data
|
|
268. |
There are two kerning entries for the same glyph (%.80s) in the same lookup subtable (%.30s)
|
|
2008-01-01 |
There are two kerning entries for the same glyph (%.80s) in the same lookup subtable (%.30s)
|
|
269. |
Bad Device Table Adjustment
|
|
2008-01-01 |
Bad Device Table Adjustment
|
|
270. |
A device table adjustment specified for %.80s is invalid
|
|
2007-12-30 |
A device table adjustment specified for %.80s is invalid
|
|
271. |
Missing glyph name
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Missing glyph name
|
|
272. |
You must specify a glyph name for subtable %s
|
|
2007-12-30 |
You must specify a glyph name for subtable %s
|
|
273. |
Missing glyph
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Missing glyph
|
|
274. |
In lookup subtable %.30s you refer to a glyph named %.80s, which is not in the font yet. Was this intentional?
|
|
2007-12-30 |
In lookup subtable %.30s you refer to a glyph named %.80s, which is not in the font yet. Was this intentional?
|
|
275. |
Substitution generates itself
|
|
2007-12-30 |
Substitution generates itself
|
|
276. |
In lookup subtable %.30s you replace a glyph with itself. Was this intentional?
|
|
2007-12-30 |
In lookup subtable %.30s you replace a glyph with itself. Was this intentional?
|
|
277. |
Unicode out of range
|
|
2008-07-20 |
Unicode out of range
|
|
278. |
Bad unicode value for an alternate unicode / variation selector
|
|
2008-07-20 |
Bad unicode value for an alternate unicode / variation selector
|
|
279. |
Unexpected Variation Selector
|
|
2008-07-20 |
Unexpected Variation Selector
|