Translations by Jen Ockwell

Jen Ockwell has submitted the following strings to this translation. Contributions are visually coded: currently used translations, unreviewed suggestions, rejected suggestions.

150 of 1060 results
12.
Exits
2007-12-30
Exits
13.
Bases
2007-12-30
Bases
14.
Entries
2007-12-30
Entries
15.
Marks
2007-12-30
Marks
16.
Add Exit Anchor...
2007-12-30
Add Exit Anchor...
17.
Add Base Anchor...
2007-12-30
Add Base Anchor...
18.
Add Entry Anchor...
2007-12-30
Add Entry Anchor...
19.
Add Mark Anchor...
2007-12-30
Add Mark Anchor...
20.
Anchor Control for class %.100s in glyph %.100s as %.20s
2007-12-30
Anchor Control for class %.100s in glyph %.100s as %.20s
21.
mark
2007-12-30
mark
22.
cursive entry
2008-01-01
cursive entry
23.
cursive exit
2008-01-01
cursive exit
24.
base
2008-01-01
base
25.
Anchor Control
2008-01-01
Anchor Control
26.
Detaching Anchor Point
2008-01-01
Detaching Anchor Point
27.
This anchor was attached to point %d, but that's not a point I can move. I'm detaching the anchor from the point.
2008-01-01
This anchor was attached to point %d, but that's not a point I can move. I'm detaching the anchor from the point.
30.
Provide a glyph name
2008-01-01
Provide a glyph name
31.
Please identify a glyph by name, and FontForge will add an anchor to that glyph.
2008-01-01
Please identify a glyph by name, and FontForge will add an anchor to that glyph.
32.
Non-existant glyph
2008-01-01
Non-existant glyph
33.
The glyph, %.80s, is not in the font
2008-01-01
The glyph, %.80s, is not in the font
34.
Duplicate Anchor Class
2007-12-30
Duplicate Anchor Class
35.
The glyph, %.80s, already contains an anchor in this class, %.80s.
2007-12-30
The glyph, %.80s, already contains an anchor in this class, %.80s.
37.
The size at which the current glyph is rasterized. For small pixelsize you may want to use the magnification factor below to get a clearer view.
2007-12-30
The size at which the current glyph is rasterised. For small pixel size you may want to use the magnification factor below to get a clearer view.
38.
The size at which the current glyph is rasterized. For small pixelsize you may want to use the magnification factor below to get a clearer view. The pulldown list contains the pixelsizes at which there are device table corrections.
2007-12-30
The size at which the current glyph is rasterised. For small pixel size you may want to use the magnification factor below to get a clearer view. The pulldown list contains the pixel sizes at which there are device table corrections.
40.
The glyph is rasterized at the size above, but it may be difficult to see the alignment errors that can happen at small pixelsizes. This allows you to expand each pixel to show potential problems better.
2007-12-30
The glyph is rasterised at the size above, but it may be difficult to see the alignment errors that can happen at small pixel sizes. This allows you to expand each pixel to show potential problems better.
41.
The X coordinate of the anchor point in this glyph
2007-12-30
The X coordinate of the anchor point in this glyph
44.
This is the number of pixels by which the anchor should be moved horizontally when the glyph is rasterized at the above size. This information is part of the device table for this anchor. Device tables are particularly important at small pixelsizes where rounding errors will have a proportionally greater effect.
2007-12-30
This is the number of pixels by which the anchor should be moved horizontally when the glyph is rasterised at the above size. This information is part of the device table for this anchor. Device tables are particularly important at small pixel sizes where rounding errors will have a proportionally greater effect.
45.
The Y coordinate of the anchor point in this glyph
2007-12-30
The Y coordinate of the anchor point in this glyph
46.
This is the number of pixels by which the anchor should be moved vertically when the glyph is rasterized at the above size. This information is part of the device table for this anchor. Device tables are particularly important at small pixelsizes where rounding errors will have a proportionally greater effect.
2007-12-30
This is the number of pixels by which the anchor should be moved vertically when the glyph is rasterised at the above size. This information is part of the device table for this anchor. Device tables are particularly important at small pixel sizes where rounding errors will have a proportionally greater effect.
78.
Select a subtable
2007-12-30
Select a subtable
79.
You must select a lookup subtable in which to store the kerning pairs
2008-01-01
You must select a lookup subtable in which to store the kerning pairs
84.
Enter two glyph ranges to be adjusted.
2008-01-01
Enter two glyph ranges to be adjusted.
88.
Lookup subtable:
2008-01-01
Lookup subtable:
248.
New Positioning
2008-01-01
New Positioning
256.
Select hints between which counters are formed
2008-01-01
Select hints between which counters are formed
265.
Duplicate Ligature
2008-01-01
Duplicate Ligature
266.
There are two ligature entries with the same components (%.80s) in the same lookup subtable (%.30s)
2008-01-01
There are two ligature entries with the same components (%.80s) in the same lookup subtable (%.30s)
267.
Duplicate Kern data
2008-01-01
Duplicate Kern data
268.
There are two kerning entries for the same glyph (%.80s) in the same lookup subtable (%.30s)
2008-01-01
There are two kerning entries for the same glyph (%.80s) in the same lookup subtable (%.30s)
269.
Bad Device Table Adjustment
2008-01-01
Bad Device Table Adjustment
270.
A device table adjustment specified for %.80s is invalid
2007-12-30
A device table adjustment specified for %.80s is invalid
271.
Missing glyph name
2007-12-30
Missing glyph name
272.
You must specify a glyph name for subtable %s
2007-12-30
You must specify a glyph name for subtable %s
273.
Missing glyph
2007-12-30
Missing glyph
274.
In lookup subtable %.30s you refer to a glyph named %.80s, which is not in the font yet. Was this intentional?
2007-12-30
In lookup subtable %.30s you refer to a glyph named %.80s, which is not in the font yet. Was this intentional?
275.
Substitution generates itself
2007-12-30
Substitution generates itself
276.
In lookup subtable %.30s you replace a glyph with itself. Was this intentional?
2007-12-30
In lookup subtable %.30s you replace a glyph with itself. Was this intentional?
277.
Unicode out of range
2008-07-20
Unicode out of range
278.
Bad unicode value for an alternate unicode / variation selector
2008-07-20
Bad unicode value for an alternate unicode / variation selector
279.
Unexpected Variation Selector
2008-07-20
Unexpected Variation Selector